Topological Preliminaries

2.3 Definitions Let XX be a topological space, as defined in Sec. 1.2.

(a) A set EXE \subset X is closed if its complement EcE^c is open. (Hence \emptyset and XX are closed, finite unions of closed sets are closed, and arbitrary intersections of closed sets are closed.)

(b) The closure Eˉ\bar{E} of a set EXE \subset X is the smallest closed set in XX which contains EE . (The following argument proves the existence of Eˉ\bar{E} : The collection Ω\Omega of all closed subsets of XX which contain EE is not empty, since XΩX \in \Omega ; let Eˉ\bar{E} be the intersection of all members of Ω\Omega .)

(c) A set KXK \subset X is compact if every open cover of KK contains a finite subcover. More explicitly, the requirement is that if {Vα}\{V_\alpha\} is a collection of open sets whose union contains KK , then the union of some finite subcollection of {Vα}\{V_\alpha\} also contains KK .
In particular, if XX is itself compact, then XX is called a compact space.

(d) A neighborhood of a point pXp \in X is any open subset of XX which contains pp . (The use of this term is not quite standardized; some use

“neighborhood of pp ” for any set which contains an open set containing pp .)

(e) XX is a Hausdorff space if the following is true: If pXp \in X , qXq \in X , and pqp \neq q , then pp has a neighborhood UU and qq has a neighborhood VV such that UV=U \cap V = \emptyset .

(f) XX is locally compact if every point of XX has a neighborhood whose closure is compact.

Obviously, every compact space is locally compact.

We recall the Heine-Borel theorem: The compact subsets of a euclidean space RnR^n are precisely those that are closed and bounded ([26],† Theorem 2.41). From this it follows easily that RnR^n is a locally compact Hausdorff space. Also, every metric space is a Hausdorff space.

2.4 Theorem Suppose KK is compact and FF is closed, in a topological space XX . If FKF \subset K , then FF is compact.

PROOF If {Vα}\{V_\alpha\} is an open cover of FF and W=FcW = F^c , then WαVαW \cup \bigcup_\alpha V_\alpha covers XX ; hence there is a finite collection {Vαi}\{V_{\alpha_i}\} such that

KWVα1Vαn.K \subset W \cup V_{\alpha_1} \cup \cdots \cup V_{\alpha_n}.

Then FVα1VαnF \subset V_{\alpha_1} \cup \cdots \cup V_{\alpha_n} . //////

Corollary If ABA \subset B and if BB has compact closure, so does AA .

2.5 Theorem Suppose XX is a Hausdorff space, KXK \subset X , KK is compact, and pKcp \in K^c . Then there are open sets UU and WW such that pUp \in U , KWK \subset W , and UW=U \cap W = \emptyset .

PROOF If qKq \in K , the Hausdorff separation axiom implies the existence of disjoint open sets UqU_q and VqV_q , such that pUqp \in U_q and qVqq \in V_q . Since KK is compact, there are points q1,,qnKq_1, \dots, q_n \in K such that

KVq1Vqn.K \subset V_{q_1} \cup \cdots \cup V_{q_n}.

Our requirements are then satisfied by the sets

U=Uq1UqnandW=Vq1Vqn.//////U = U_{q_1} \cap \cdots \cap U_{q_n} \quad \text{and} \quad W = V_{q_1} \cup \cdots \cup V_{q_n}. \quad //////

Corollaries

(a) Compact subsets of Hausdorff spaces are closed.

(b) If FF is closed and KK is compact in a Hausdorff space, then FKF \cap K is compact.

Corollary (b) follows from (a) and Theorem 2.4.

† Numbers in brackets refer to the Bibliography.

2.6 Theorem If {Kα}\{K_\alpha\} is a collection of compact subsets of a Hausdorff space and if αKα=\bigcap_\alpha K_\alpha = \emptyset , then some finite subcollection of {Kα}\{K_\alpha\} also has empty intersection.

PROOF Put Vα=KαcV_\alpha = K_\alpha^c . Fix a member K1K_1 of {Kα}\{K_\alpha\} . Since no point of K1K_1 belongs to every KαK_\alpha , {Vα}\{V_\alpha\} is an open cover of K1K_1 . Hence K1Vα1VαnK_1 \subset V_{\alpha_1} \cup \cdots \cup V_{\alpha_n} for some finite collection {Vαi}\{V_{\alpha_i}\} . This implies that

K1Kα1Kαn=.////K_1 \cap K_{\alpha_1} \cap \cdots \cap K_{\alpha_n} = \emptyset. \quad \text{////}

2.7 Theorem Suppose UU is open in a locally compact Hausdorff space XX , KUK \subset U , and KK is compact. Then there is an open set VV with compact closure such that

KVVˉU.K \subset V \subset \bar{V} \subset U.

PROOF Since every point of KK has a neighborhood with compact closure, and since KK is covered by the union of finitely many of these neighborhoods, KK lies in an open set GG with compact closure. If U=XU = X , take V=GV = G .

Otherwise, let CC be the complement of UU . Theorem 2.5 shows that to each pCp \in C there corresponds an open set WpW_p such that KWpK \subset W_p and pWˉpp \notin \bar{W}_p . Hence {CGˉWˉp}\{C \cap \bar{G} \cap \bar{W}_p\} , where pp ranges over CC , is a collection of compact sets with empty intersection. By Theorem 2.6 there are points p1,,pnCp_1, \dots, p_n \in C such that

CGˉWˉp1Wˉpn=.C \cap \bar{G} \cap \bar{W}_{p_1} \cap \cdots \cap \bar{W}_{p_n} = \emptyset.

The set

V=GWp1WpnV = G \cap W_{p_1} \cap \cdots \cap W_{p_n}

then has the required properties, since

VˉGˉWˉp1Wˉpn.////\bar{V} \subset \bar{G} \cap \bar{W}_{p_1} \cap \cdots \cap \bar{W}_{p_n}. \quad \text{////}

2.8 Definition Let ff be a real (or extended-real) function on a topological space. If

{x:f(x)>α}\{x: f(x) > \alpha\}

is open for every real α\alpha , ff is said to be lower semicontinuous. If

{x:f(x)<α}\{x: f(x) < \alpha\}

is open for every real α\alpha , ff is said to be upper semicontinuous.

A real function is obviously continuous if and only if it is both upper and lower semicontinuous.

The simplest examples of semicontinuity are furnished by characteristic functions:

(a) Characteristic functions of open sets are lower semicontinuous.
(b) Characteristic functions of closed sets are upper semicontinuous.

The following property is an almost immediate consequence of the definitions:

(c) The supremum of any collection of lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous. The infimum of any collection of upper semicontinuous functions is upper semicontinuous.

2.9 Definition The support of a complex function ff on a topological space XX is the closure of the set

{x:f(x)0}.\{x: f(x) \neq 0\}.

The collection of all continuous complex functions on XX whose support is compact is denoted by Cc(X)C_c(X) .

Observe that Cc(X)C_c(X) is a vector space. This is due to two facts:

(a) The support of f+gf+g lies in the union of the support of ff and the support of gg , and any finite union of compact sets is compact.
(b) The sum of two continuous complex functions is continuous, as are scalar multiples of continuous functions.

(Statement and proof of Theorem 1.8 hold verbatim if “measurable function” is replaced by “continuous function,” “measurable space” by “topological space”; take Φ(s,t)=s+t\Phi(s, t) = s + t , or Φ(s,t)=st\Phi(s, t) = st , to prove that sums and products of continuous functions are continuous.)

2.10 Theorem Let XX and YY be topological spaces, and let f:XYf: X \to Y be continuous. If KK is a compact subset of XX , then f(K)f(K) is compact.

PROOF If {Vα}\{V_\alpha\} is an open cover of f(K)f(K) , then {f1(Vα)}\{f^{-1}(V_\alpha)\} is an open cover of KK , hence Kf1(Vα1)f1(Vαn)K \subset f^{-1}(V_{\alpha_1}) \cup \cdots \cup f^{-1}(V_{\alpha_n}) for some α1,,αn\alpha_1, \dots, \alpha_n , and therefore f(K)Vα1Vαnf(K) \subset V_{\alpha_1} \cup \cdots \cup V_{\alpha_n} . ////

Corollary The range of any fCc(X)f \in C_c(X) is a compact subset of the complex plane.

In fact, if KK is the support of fCc(X)f \in C_c(X) , then f(X)f(K){0}f(X) \subset f(K) \cup \{0\} . If XX is not compact, then 0f(X)0 \in f(X) , but 00 need not lie in f(K)f(K) , as is seen by easy examples.

2.11 Notation In this chapter the following conventions will be used. The notation

Kf(1)K \prec f \quad (1)

will mean that KK is a compact subset of XX , that fCc(X)f \in C_c(X) , that 0f(x)10 \le f(x) \le 1 for all xXx \in X , and that f(x)=1f(x) = 1 for all xKx \in K . The notation

f<V(2)f < V \quad (2)

will mean that VV is open, that fCc(X)f \in C_c(X) , 0f10 \le f \le 1 , and that the support of ff lies in VV . The notation

K<f<V(3)K < f < V \quad (3)

will be used to indicate that both (1) and (2) hold.

2.12 Urysohn’s Lemma Suppose XX is a locally compact Hausdorff space, VV is open in XX , KVK \subset V , and KK is compact. Then there exists an fCc(X)f \in C_c(X) , such that

K<f<V.(1)K < f < V. \quad (1)

In terms of characteristic functions, the conclusion asserts the existence of a continuous function ff which satisfies the inequalities χKfχV\chi_K \le f \le \chi_V . Note that it is easy to find semicontinuous functions which do this; examples are χK\chi_K and χV\chi_V .

PROOF Put r1=0r_1 = 0 , r2=1r_2 = 1 , and let r3,r4,r5,r_3, r_4, r_5, \dots be an enumeration of the rationals in (0,1)(0, 1) . By Theorem 2.7, we can find open sets V0V_0 and then V1V_1 such that Vˉ0\bar{V}_0 is compact and

KV1Vˉ1V0Vˉ0V.(2)K \subset V_1 \subset \bar{V}_1 \subset V_0 \subset \bar{V}_0 \subset V. \quad (2)

Suppose n2n \ge 2 and Vr1,,VrnV_{r_1}, \dots, V_{r_n} have been chosen in such a manner that ri<rjr_i < r_j implies VˉrjVri\bar{V}_{r_j} \subset V_{r_i} . Then one of the numbers r1,,rnr_1, \dots, r_n , say rir_i , will be the largest one which is smaller than rn+1r_{n+1} , and another, say rjr_j , will be the smallest one larger than rn+1r_{n+1} . Using Theorem 2.7 again, we can find Vrn+1V_{r_{n+1}} so that

VˉrjVrn+1Vˉrn+1Vri.\bar{V}_{r_j} \subset V_{r_{n+1}} \subset \bar{V}_{r_{n+1}} \subset V_{r_i}.

Continuing, we obtain a collection {Vr}\{V_r\} of open sets, one for every rational r[0,1]r \in [0, 1] , with the following properties: KV1K \subset V_1 , Vˉ0V\bar{V}_0 \subset V , each Vˉr\bar{V}_r is compact, and

s>r implies VˉsVr.(3)s > r \text{ implies } \bar{V}_s \subset V_r. \quad (3)

Define

fr(x)={rif xVr,0otherwise,gs(x)={1if xVˉs,sotherwise,(4)f_r(x) = \begin{cases} r & \text{if } x \in V_r, \\ 0 & \text{otherwise,} \end{cases} \quad g_s(x) = \begin{cases} 1 & \text{if } x \in \bar{V}_s, \\ s & \text{otherwise,} \end{cases} \quad (4)

and

f=suprfr,g=infsgs.(5)f = \sup_r f_r, \quad g = \inf_s g_s. \quad (5)

The remarks following Definition 2.8 show that ff is lower semicontinuous and that gg is upper semicontinuous. It is clear that 0f10 \le f \le 1 , that

f(x)=1f(x) = 1 if xKx \in K , and that ff has its support in Vˉ0\bar{V}_0 . The proof will be completed by showing that f=gf = g .

The inequality fr(x)>gs(x)f_r(x) > g_s(x) is possible only if r>sr > s , xVrx \in V_r , and xVˉsx \notin \bar{V}_s . But r>sr > s implies VrVsV_r \subset V_s . Hence frgsf_r \le g_s for all rr and ss , so fgf \le g .

Suppose f(x)<g(x)f(x) < g(x) for some xx . Then there are rationals rr and ss such that f(x)<r<s<g(x)f(x) < r < s < g(x) . Since f(x)<rf(x) < r , we have xVrx \notin V_r ; since g(x)>sg(x) > s , we have xVˉsx \in \bar{V}_s . By (3), this is a contradiction. Hence f=gf = g . ////

2.13 Theorem Suppose V1,,VnV_1, \dots, V_n are open subsets of a locally compact Hausdorff space XX , KK is compact, and

KV1Vn.K \subset V_1 \cup \cdots \cup V_n.

Then there exist functions hi<Vih_i < V_i ( i=1,,ni = 1, \dots, n ) such that

h1(x)++hn(x)=1(xK).(1)h_1(x) + \cdots + h_n(x) = 1 \quad (x \in K). \quad (1)

Because of (1), the collection {h1,,hn}\{h_1, \dots, h_n\} is called a partition of unity on KK , subordinate to the cover {V1,,Vn}\{V_1, \dots, V_n\} .

PROOF By Theorem 2.7, each xKx \in K has a neighborhood WxW_x with compact closure WˉxVi\bar{W}_x \subset V_i for some ii (depending on xx ). There are points x1,,xmx_1, \dots, x_m such that Wˉx1WˉxmK\bar{W}_{x_1} \cup \cdots \cup \bar{W}_{x_m} \supset K . If 1in1 \le i \le n , let HiH_i be the union of those Wˉxj\bar{W}_{x_j} which lie in ViV_i . By Urysohn’s lemma, there are functions gig_i such that Hi<gi<ViH_i < g_i < V_i . Define

h1=g1h2=(1g1)g2hn=(1g1)(1g2)(1gn1)gn.(2)\begin{aligned} h_1 &= g_1 \\ h_2 &= (1 - g_1)g_2 \\ &\vdots \\ h_n &= (1 - g_1)(1 - g_2) \cdots (1 - g_{n-1})g_n. \end{aligned} \quad (2)

Then hi<Vih_i < V_i . It is easily verified, by induction, that

h1+h2++hn=1(1g1)(1g2)(1gn).(3)h_1 + h_2 + \cdots + h_n = 1 - (1 - g_1)(1 - g_2) \cdots (1 - g_n). \quad (3)

Since KH1HnK \subset H_1 \cup \cdots \cup H_n , at least one gi(x)=1g_i(x) = 1 at each point xKx \in K ; hence (3) shows that (1) holds. ////